"The northeast monsoon is less predictable but no less consequential than the southwest monsoon." Discuss this with reference to forecasting limits and El Niño.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →The northeast monsoon (NEM), or retreating monsoon, brings October–December rain to five subdivisions of South Peninsular India. It supplies about 30% of the region's annual rainfall and about 48% of Tamil Nadu's [1]. Its total volume is smaller than the southwest monsoon's (SWM), but it is harder to forecast and just as important regionally.
Why the NEM is less predictable
- Wide "normal" band: IMD calls a season normal if rain falls anywhere between 88% and 112% of the LPA (~334 mm) [1]. That range is too broad to guide planning.
- Atmospheric noise: IMD itself says that seasonal predictability is limited by strong day-to-day variability, disturbances in the tropical easterlies and the Madden-Julian Oscillation [1].
- Season totals hide extreme spells: In 2015, radar recorded rain at 100–200 mm/hour, which is cloudburst intensity, over Chennai [2]. No seasonal outlook captures that.
- Shorter forecasting history: IMD has issued NEM outlooks only since 1998 [1].
The El Niño factor
- El Niño usually weakens the SWM, but IMD notes that ENSO strongly influences year-to-year NEM variability [1].
- 2026: With a strong, strengthening El Niño and a neutral IOD, IMD expects normal-to-above-normal rain in southern Kerala and Tamil Nadu but below-normal rain elsewhere [1]. The same driver can bring floods to one district and drought to another.
- IMD warns that climate change will make heavy rain and dry spells more frequent and more intense [1].
Why it is no less consequential
- Agriculture and water: The NEM coincides with the region's second agricultural season. A shortfall reduces reservoir recharge, groundwater and crop output [1].
- Disaster risk: In 2015, three weather systems during the NEM inundated Chennai [2].
- Governance multiplier: CAG found that storm-drain gaps, missing links and encroachment on water bodies made the 2015 flooding worse [3].
El Niño ──► weak SWM ──► dry reservoirs, kharif stress
│
└──► erratic NEM ──► extreme spells (floods) + local deficits
Fig.: One driver, two-season risk for South India
The NEM's uncertainty therefore makes it more dangerous, not less important. The way forward is to combine IMD's impact-based forecasts and Doppler-radar nowcasting [1][2] with reservoir rules tied to forecasts and drainage and encroachment reforms of the kind the CAG recommended [3]. This would build the climate resilience that SDG 11 and SDG 13 call for.
Sources
- 1IMD, Northeast Monsoon Seasonal Outlook Forum 2026 (1 Oct 2026): NEM share of rainfall, LPA and normal band, predictability limits, ENSO/IOD, spatial outlook, climate-change extremes, agricultural and water impact, outlooks since 1998
- 2Ray & Kannan, "Validation of Cloud Burst over Chennai in 2015 using Radar data", MAUSAM 73(3), 2022 (IMD): 100–200 mm/hour rain rates, three weather systems, Chennai inundation, Doppler radar
- 3CAG Report No. 4 of 2017: Performance Audit of Flood Management and Response in Chennai and its Suburban Area: storm-drain gaps, missing links, encroachments