·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEconomyS&T

Semiconductors are being described as the 'new oil' of geopolitics. Analyze India's positioning in the global semiconductor supply chain in light of ISM 2.0.

In this answer
  1. Why the 'new oil' analogy holds — and where it differs
  2. India's present position
  3. How ISM 2.0 repositions India
  4. Constraints

Chips today do what crude oil did in the twentieth century — they underwrite industrial capacity, military edge and bargaining power, and their supply is concentrated in a handful of geographies. India, historically a chip consumer, is using the India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, notified in 2026 with an outlay of about ₹1.28 lakh crore, to convert import dependence into supply-chain leverage [3].

Why the 'new oil' analogy holds — and where it differs

  • Like oil, chips are chokepoint commodities: fabrication and advanced lithography are geographically concentrated, making export controls a foreign-policy instrument.
  • Unlike oil, the scarcity is man-made, not geological — it rests on capital, tacit know-how and intellectual property, which a late entrant can acquire through policy [1].

India's present position

  • ISM 1.0 (2021, ₹76,000 crore, up to 50% fab subsidy) seeded capacity; 12 projects worth ~₹1.64 lakh crore — one silicon fab, two compound-semiconductor fabs and nine packaging units — stand approved [2][4].
  • The first Made-in-India chips, presented to the Prime Minister, mark entry into legacy-node manufacturing and ATMP/OSAT assembly, the labour-and-scale end of the chain [5].

How ISM 2.0 repositions India

  • Six fungible pillars — design, equipment and materials, fabs, packaging, R&D and talent — shift the mission from building fabs to owning the ecosystem [3].
  • Fab capital subsidy recalibrated to up to 40%, while R&D and talent get up to 75%, backing India's real comparative advantage in design engineering [3].
  • Emphasis on indigenous full-stack IP and equipment/materials targets the upstream gap that leaves even domestic fabs import-reliant [1].

Constraints

  • Absence of leading-edge nodes, dependence on imported tools, ultra-pure water and assured power, and weaker outcome-tracking under fungible pillars.

India's realistic aspiration is not autarky but indispensability — becoming a trusted node whose design, packaging and talent the world cannot easily route around. If ISM 2.0's talent and IP pillars are executed with state-level infrastructure support, chips can anchor Atmanirbhar Bharat much as energy security anchored an earlier era.

Sources

  1. 1Budget 2026-27 announces the launch of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, PIBISM 2.0 focus on equipment, materials, full-stack Indian IP and resilient supply chains; ₹1,000 crore FY27 provision
  2. 2India Semiconductor Mission — approvals update, PIB12 approved projects worth ~₹1.64 lakh crore; one fab, two compound fabs, nine packaging units
  3. 3India Semiconductor Mission official portal (ism.gov.in)ISM 2.0 outlay, six-pillar structure and revised subsidy rates
  4. 4India Semiconductor Mission 2.0 backgrounder (PIB document)ISM 1.0 launch (2021), ₹76,000 crore outlay, 50% fab capital subsidy
  5. 5Prime Minister presented with first set of Made-in-India chips, PIBfirst domestically manufactured chips milestone
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity