·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEconomyS&T

Semiconductors are being described as the 'new oil' of geopolitics. Analyze India's positioning in the global semiconductor supply chain in light of ISM 2.0.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Why the 'new oil' analogy holds — and where it differs
  2. India's present position
  3. How ISM 2.0 repositions India
  4. Constraints

Chips today do what crude oil did in the twentieth century — they underwrite industrial capacity, military edge and bargaining power, and their supply is concentrated in a handful of geographies. India, historically a chip consumer, is using the India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, notified in 2026 with an outlay of about ₹1.28 lakh crore, to convert import dependence into supply-chain leverage [3].

Why the 'new oil' analogy holds — and where it differs

  • Like oil, chips are chokepoint commodities: fabrication and advanced lithography are geographically concentrated, making export controls a foreign-policy instrument.
  • Unlike oil, the scarcity is man-made, not geological — it rests on capital, tacit know-how and intellectual property, which a late entrant can acquire through policy [1].

India's present position

  • ISM 1.0 (2021, ₹76,000 crore, up to 50% fab subsidy) seeded capacity; 12 projects worth ~₹1.64 lakh crore — one silicon fab, two compound-semiconductor fabs and nine packaging units — stand approved [2][4].
  • The first Made-in-India chips, presented to the Prime Minister, mark entry into legacy-node manufacturing and ATMP/OSAT assembly, the labour-and-scale end of the chain [5].

How ISM 2.0 repositions India

  • Six fungible pillars — design, equipment and materials, fabs, packaging, R&D and talent — shift the mission from building fabs to owning the ecosystem [3].
  • Fab capital subsidy recalibrated to up to 40%, while R&D and talent get up to 75%, backing India's real comparative advantage in design engineering [3].
  • Emphasis on indigenous full-stack IP and equipment/materials targets the upstream gap that leaves even domestic fabs import-reliant [1].

Constraints

  • Absence of leading-edge nodes, dependence on imported tools, ultra-pure water and assured power, and weaker outcome-tracking under fungible pillars.

India's realistic aspiration is not autarky but indispensability — becoming a trusted node whose design, packaging and talent the world cannot easily route around. If ISM 2.0's talent and IP pillars are executed with state-level infrastructure support, chips can anchor Atmanirbhar Bharat much as energy security anchored an earlier era.

Sources

  1. 1Budget 2026-27 announces the launch of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, PIBISM 2.0 focus on equipment, materials, full-stack Indian IP and resilient supply chains; ₹1,000 crore FY27 provision
  2. 2India Semiconductor Mission — approvals update, PIB12 approved projects worth ~₹1.64 lakh crore; one fab, two compound fabs, nine packaging units
  3. 3India Semiconductor Mission official portal (ism.gov.in)ISM 2.0 outlay, six-pillar structure and revised subsidy rates
  4. 4India Semiconductor Mission 2.0 backgrounder (PIB document)ISM 1.0 launch (2021), ₹76,000 crore outlay, 50% fab capital subsidy
  5. 5Prime Minister presented with first set of Made-in-India chips, PIBfirst domestically manufactured chips milestone
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity