FUNDS FOR DAY-NRLM

I have sufficient facts from Tier 1 sources. Writing the study note.

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

Parameter Detail
Full name Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana – National Rural Livelihoods Mission
Nodal Ministry Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India [S1][S3]
Nature Centrally Sponsored Scheme (poverty alleviation, self-employment) [S3]
SHGs formed 92 lakh (women SHGs ~90.90 lakh as of June 2025) [S1][S3]
Households mobilised 10.05 crore [S1]
FY 2026-27 total central allocation ₹11,62,930 lakh (as per Annexure-I to 21 Jul 2026 reply) [S1]
Funds released (FY 2026-27) ₹5,79,940 lakh [S1]
Expenditure (up to June 2026) ₹1,82,750 lakh [S1]
Top allocation states Uttar Pradesh (₹2,43,100 lakh), Bihar (₹1,68,859 lakh), Maharashtra (₹1,05,957 lakh), West Bengal (₹90,225 lakh), Odisha (₹81,189 lakh) [S1]
Cumulative SHG credit disbursed Over ₹11 lakh crore via formal financial institutions [S3]
Digital platforms LokOS, e-FMAS/GramNidhi, PFMS [S1]
Training infrastructure 619 Community Managed Training Centres (CMTCs) at block level [S1]
Predecessor scheme Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) [S3]

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Economic - SHG-Bank linkage and revolving fund/community investment support deepen rural financial inclusion; ₹11 lakh crore+ cumulative credit disbursed shows scale of formal-credit penetration into unbanked rural women. [S3] - 3ie (2025) study found household incomes up 9.5% in NRLM-intervention blocks; mature clusters saw 12-33% income gains and 6-11% rise in per-capita consumption. [S1]

Social - Predominantly a women-centric institution-building programme — mobilisation explicitly targets women's SHGs, aiding gender empowerment and collective bargaining. [S1][S3] - Builds three-tier institutional architecture (SHG → VO → CLF) fostering social capital among poor and marginalised rural households.

Administrative - Centre-State funding split under a centrally sponsored scheme model creates dependency on timely State utilisation — FY 2026-27 data shows expenditure (₹1,82,750 lakh) trailing releases (₹5,79,940 lakh), a recurring implementation-lag issue typical of CSS schemes. [S1] - State-wise disparity in allocation (UP and Bihar receiving disproportionately large shares) reflects population/poverty-weighted funding formula.

Governance/Ethical - Use of digital PFMS and e-FMAS/GramNidhi platforms aimed at improving fund-flow transparency and reducing leakage. [S1] - Independent third-party evaluation (3ie) reflects an evidence-based governance approach to scheme validation.

6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources