775 Fast Track Special Courts Functional Across 29 States/UTs; Centre Extends FTSC Scheme Till September 2026

Web search/fetch is persistently unavailable (repeated 529 overload errors from the API). I'll proceed using only the user-supplied PIB excerpt, which is itself a Tier 1 (pib.gov.in) primary source and contains enough distinct facts to satisfy the sufficiency bar:

  1. Scheme launched October 2019 (FTSCs incl. ePOCSO courts)
  2. Purpose: expeditious trial of rape/POCSO Act 2012 cases
  3. Extended twice, last extension valid up to 31.03.2026, target 790 FTSCs
  4. Temporarily extended up to 30 September 2026
  5. As of 30.04.2026: 775 FTSCs functional (incl. 398 exclusive e-POCSO courts) across 29 States/UTs

I do not have independent corroboration beyond the single PIB excerpt (no additional search results retrieved due to tool failure), so I'll build the note strictly from this source and flag that scope in Sources.

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

Parameter Detail
Scheme name Fast Track Special Courts (FTSCs), including exclusive POCSO (e-POCSO) Courts [S1]
Type Centrally Sponsored Scheme [S1]
Nodal ministry Ministry of Law and Justice (release issued by this ministry) [S1]
Launch year October 2019 [S1]
Governing/subject law POCSO Act, 2012; rape offences (IPC/BNS) [S1]
Sanctioned target (as per last extension) 790 FTSCs [S1]
Functional courts (as of 30.04.2026) 775 FTSCs [S1]
Of which exclusive e-POCSO courts 398 [S1]
Geographic coverage 29 States/UTs [S1]
Previous extension validity Up to 31.03.2026 [S1]
Latest extension validity Up to 30.09.2026 (temporary) [S1]
Data source for functional courts Information furnished by High Courts [S1]

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources

Note: Web search/fetch tools were unavailable throughout this session (persistent server-side 529 overload errors), so this note relies solely on the single user-supplied PIB excerpt rather than the mandated 3-search corroboration process. Facts beyond that excerpt (e.g., funding source, exact budget outlay) could not be verified and have been deliberately omitted rather than speculated.