PESTICIDE MANAGEMENT BILL

Now I have sufficient grounded facts. Writing the study note.

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

Item Detail
Nodal Ministry/Department Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare [S1]
Law being replaced Insecticides Act, 1968 & Insecticides Rules, 1971 [S6]
Draft circulated to states/ministries 30 December 2025 [S1]
Draft placed in public domain 7 January 2026 [S1]
Public comment deadline (2025 draft) 4 February 2026 [S5]
Aligned reform framework Jan Vishwas Act [S1]
Key regulatory bodies (per 2020 draft template) Central Pesticides Board; Registration Committee [S6]
Max penalty (2020 draft) Imprisonment up to 3 years, fine up to ₹40 lakh, or both, for unlicensed operation [S6]
Household pesticide users Exempt from licensing and prosecution [S6]
Ban powers Authorities may prohibit hazardous pesticides for up to 1 year [S6]
Inspection/seizure Inspectors may halt sales up to 60 days pending testing [S6]
MoS who answered in Parliament (28 Jul 2026) Shri Ramnath Thakur [S1]

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Economic - Aims for price regulation authorities to check profiteering on pesticides, directly affecting farm input costs [S6]. - Stricter accreditation/licensing raises compliance costs for manufacturers/dealers but is meant to curb spurious-pesticide losses to farmers [S5].

Social - "Farmer-centric" design with transparency and traceability provisions intended to protect farmers from spurious/adulterated pesticides [S5]. - Consultation explicitly included farmers, dealers/retailers, and NGOs, reflecting a wider stakeholder net than the 1968 Act era [S1].

Environmental - Core objective: "minimise the risk to humans, animals, and environment" from pesticide use — carried forward from the 2020 draft's framing [S6]. - Provision to ban environmentally hazardous pesticides for up to a year signals a precautionary regulatory stance [S6].

Legal/Governance - Explicit alignment with the Jan Vishwas Act, i.e., decriminalising/rationalising minor offences while retaining strong penalties for serious violations — a governance-reform thread running through recent economic legislation [S1]. - Introduces data protection provisions for proprietary pesticide-registration data, a new and contested issue versus the 1968 Act [S1].

Administrative - Two-stage consultation (government/state stage, then public/stakeholder stage) shows a federal-consultative drafting process [S1]. - Mandatory accreditation of testing laboratories aims to standardise quality control across states [S5].

6. Recent Developments (last 12–18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources