·PIB

GeM Samvad 2026 Highlights Reforms to Improve Public Procurement Access and Affordability for MSEs

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this note
  1. At a Glance
  2. Why in the News
  3. Background & Evolution
  4. Core Static Facts
  5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis
  6. Recent Developments (last 12–18 months)
  7. Prelims Hooks
  8. What the '97% Pay Nothing' Claim Counts, and What It Leaves Out
  9. Cheaper Entry Does Not Mean Faster Payment
  10. Why the 25% Target Is Met but the SC/ST Target Is Not
  11. What the CAG Found Wrong With GeM Itself
  12. What Parliament's Committee Says Should Come Next
  13. Anchors for Answers
  14. Mains Relevance
  15. Related Topics to Study Next
  16. NCERT Concepts to Revise
  17. Common Errors / Trap Areas

1. At a Glance

  • GeM Samvad 2026 was an outreach event run by the Government e-Marketplace (GeM) with Laghu Udyog Bharati (LUB). It highlighted reforms that make public procurement cheaper and easier for Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) [1].
  • The reforms work on three levers:
  • Lower cost: a lower transaction charge, no Caution Money deposit, and lower OEM vendor assessment fees.
  • Easier credit: TReDS integration and GeM SAHAY, which lends without collateral against GeM purchase orders.
  • Outreach: LUB's office network and volunteer-run help counters [1].

  • Why it matters for UPSC: It brings together public procurement reform, MSME competitiveness, delayed payments to MSMEs, digital governance (GS-II/III), and the 25% MSE procurement mandate [1][6].

2. Why in the News

  • 28 Oct 2026: The Ministry of Commerce & Industry released the GeM Samvad 2026 highlights. Its headline claim is that nearly 97% of GeM orders now attract no transaction charge [1].
  • Union Budget 2026–27: The Budget proposed linking GeM with TReDS, so that financiers can see government purchases from MSMEs and lend against them more cheaply and quickly. The release says GeM is now integrated with all five TReDS exchanges [1][11][13].

3. Background & Evolution

  • 9 Aug 2016: The Ministry of Commerce & Industry launched GeM as an open, transparent online platform for government buying [3][4].
  • Public Procurement Policy for MSEs:
  • The earlier procurement target for MSEs was 20%; it was later raised to 25% [8].
  • A gazette notification of 9 Nov 2018 amended the policy and kept the 25% target with its sub-targets [7].

  • FY 2021–22:

  • GeM's annual procurement crossed ₹1 lakh crore [5].
  • Purchases from MSEs made up 57% of Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) in FY 2021–22 [5].

  • January 2024 onwards: OEM vendor assessment charges were cut by 66–92% [1].

  • 2024: GeM signed an MoU with Laghu Udyog Bharati for awareness campaigns and help with onboarding sellers [1].
  • Sept 2024 (GeM's "100 days of governance"): Transaction charges were revised [2]:
  • Orders up to ₹10 lakh pay nothing (the earlier limit was ₹5 lakh).
  • Orders from ₹10 lakh to ₹10 crore pay 0.30% (down from 0.45%).
  • Orders above ₹10 crore pay a flat ₹3 lakh.

  • July 2025: The Caution Money deposit at seller onboarding was dropped [1].

  • Feb 2026: The Budget announced the GeM–TReDS link [11][12].
  • Oct 2026: GeM Samvad 2026 [1].

4. Core Static Facts

Item Fact
Parent ministry Ministry of Commerce & Industry (not the Ministry of MSME) [1][4]
Launched 9 Aug 2016 [3]
Transaction charge 0.30% of order value, down from 0.50% per the 2026 release [1]
Orders exempt from charge Up to ₹10 lakh (earlier ₹5 lakh) [1][2]
Cap on charge ₹3 lakh for orders above ₹10 crore (earlier maximum ₹72.50 lakh) [1]
Orders with no charge ~97% [1]
Caution Money Abolished July 2025 [1]
OEM vendor assessment charges Cut 66–92% since Jan 2024 [1]
MSE procurement mandate 25% of annual procurement by central ministries, departments and CPSEs. Within this, 4% must come from SC/ST-owned MSEs and 3% from women-owned MSEs [6]
Items reserved for MSEs 358 [9]
MSE footprint on GeM 11 lakh+ registered MSEs; 51 lakh+ orders; ₹2.36 lakh crore+ in value [4]
TReDS GeM integrated with all 5 exchanges [1]
More than ₹7 lakh crore made available to MSMEs through TReDS [14]
GeM SAHAY Collateral-free loans with the GeM purchase order as the basis for credit [1]

Other TReDS measures in Budget 2026–27 [11][12]:

  • CPSEs must use TReDS to settle all their purchases from MSMEs.
  • CGTMSE will provide a credit guarantee for invoice discounting on TReDS.
  • TReDS receivables can be treated as asset-backed securities.

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Economic

  • Removing Caution Money and lowering fees frees working capital. This matters most for micro sellers, since nearly all small orders now carry no charge [1].
  • TReDS and GeM SAHAY target delayed payments, the most persistent stress point for MSMEs [1][11].
  • Central procurement from MSEs was ₹93,017.08 crore (43.58%), well above the 25% floor [9].

Social / Equity

  • The 4% SC/ST sub-target is badly missed: the SC/ST share was about 1.3% in FY 2024–25 up to November 2024 [6][10].
  • The release calls this "democratised" access in digital form. Volunteer help counters reach entrepreneurs with low digital skills [1].

Governance / Ethical

  • A single digital marketplace improves transparency and reduces discretion in buying decisions [3].
  • The "Trusted Seller" ecosystem aims to build buyer confidence through a verified seller base [1].

Administrative

  • Partnering with an industry body (LUB) helps with last-mile outreach. Through virtual conferences, a pan-India office network and help counters, it supplements GeM's limited field presence [1].
  • The GeM–TReDS link depends on sharing purchase data between GeM and the exchanges [11].

Technological

  • Linking procurement data to credit platforms (GeM to TReDS and GeM SAHAY) lets lenders use digital transaction records in place of collateral [1][13].

6. Recent Developments (last 12–18 months)

  • July 2025: Caution Money abolished [1].
  • Dec 2025: The MSME Ministry's Year End Review reported a 43.58% MSE share in central procurement and 358 reserved items [9].
  • 1 Feb 2026: The Budget 2026–27 speech announced the GeM–TReDS link, compulsory TReDS settlement for CPSE purchases, and a CGTMSE guarantee for TReDS invoice discounting [11][12].
  • Feb 2026: A PIB explainer, "Building Champion MSMEs for a Global India", covered these measures [13].
  • 28 Oct 2026: GeM Samvad 2026 with LUB:
  • ~97% of orders carry no charge.
  • GeM is integrated with all five TReDS exchanges.
  • GeM SAHAY was showcased [1].

7. Prelims Hooks

  • GeM was launched on 9 Aug 2016 under the Ministry of Commerce & Industry [3][4].
  • The GeM transaction charge is 0.30% of order value [1][2].
  • Orders up to ₹10 lakh pay no charge; the limit was raised from ₹5 lakh [2].
  • The charge is capped at ₹3 lakh for orders above ₹10 crore [1][2].
  • About 97% of GeM orders pay no transaction charge (2026) [1].
  • Caution Money for sellers was abolished in July 2025 [1].
  • OEM vendor assessment charges have been cut by 66–92% since January 2024 [1].
  • GeM signed an MoU with Laghu Udyog Bharati in 2024 [1].
  • GeM SAHAY gives collateral-free loans with the purchase order as the basis for credit [1].
  • GeM is integrated with all five TReDS exchanges, following the Budget 2026–27 announcement [1][11].
  • Mandate: 25% of annual central procurement from MSEs, including 4% from SC/ST-owned and 3% from women-owned MSEs [6].
  • The Public Procurement Policy for MSEs was amended on 9 Nov 2018 [7].
  • 358 items are reserved for exclusive purchase from MSEs [9].
  • Budget 2026–27 proposed CGTMSE credit guarantees for invoice discounting on TReDS [12].

8. What the '97% Pay Nothing' Claim Counts, and What It Leaves Out

  • The 97% figure counts orders, not rupees
  • The release says about 97% of GeM orders carry no transaction charge [1].
  • It does not say what share of the total money value those orders make up.
  • Small orders are many in number but small in value. So 97% of orders can be fee-free while most of the money still flows through orders that pay a fee.

  • The biggest rupee saving went to the biggest sellers

  • Before the reform, the charge on one order could go up to ₹72.50 lakh. Now it stops at ₹3 lakh [1].
  • Only orders above ₹10 crore get this cap [1][2]. Micro firms rarely win orders of that size.
  • Micro firms gain from the higher exemption limit (₹5 lakh raised to ₹10 lakh) [2]. But a fee of under half a per cent was never their main cost.

  • How to use this in an answer: say the fee reform is real. Then point out that a claim about how many orders pay nothing does not show how much small firms gained.

9. Cheaper Entry Does Not Mean Faster Payment

  • Getting paid is the bigger problem, and GeM has struggled with it for years
  • In Report No. 18 of 2020, the CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General, India's top auditor) found GeM's aim of faster procurement only partly achieved. It noted "numerous delays, especially in payment" [15].
  • The Economic Survey 2025–26, as cited by Parliament's Standing Committee on Industry, puts about ₹8.1 lakh crore stuck in delayed payments to MSMEs [16].
  • The MSME Samadhaan portal (where MSEs complain about late payment) holds 2,56,892 applications worth about ₹55,244 crore [16].

  • The complaint system is not clearing cases

  • The ODR (Online Dispute Resolution) portal was launched on 15 Oct 2025. It settled only 17 cases in eight months [16].
  • The Committee called this pace grossly inadequate [16].

  • TReDS and GeM SAHAY help the seller manage a late payment. They do not stop it.

  • Both give the seller cash early by lending against an order or an invoice [1].
  • The government buyer who pays late faces no new cost under these tools.
  • So the reform makes waiting for payment easier to survive, but buyers have no new reason to pay on time.

10. Why the 25% Target Is Met but the SC/ST Target Is Not

  • The overall number hides who actually gets the orders
  • Central buying from MSEs reached 43.58%, far above the 25% floor [9].
  • Yet SC/ST-owned MSEs got only about 1.3%, against a 4% sub-target [6][10].
  • Hitting the main target says nothing about whether the sub-targets were met.

  • No single buyer is answerable for the shortfall

  • The targets are reported for central procurement as a whole. A CPSE (Central Public Sector Enterprise) that buys little from SC/ST firms faces no specific penalty.
  • The Standing Committee asked for CPSE-wise annual sub-targets, compulsory disclosure of shortfalls, and penalties linked to each CPSE's MoU (its yearly performance agreement with the government) [16].

  • Lower fees do not fix this gap

  • The cost cuts apply equally to every seller [1]. Nothing in them is aimed at SC/ST-owned firms.
  • LUB's help counters reach sellers with low digital skills [1]. But a fee waiver cannot fix a gap that comes from buyers not placing orders with these firms.

11. What the CAG Found Wrong With GeM Itself

  • The bidding system was never independently checked for security
  • MeitY has published guidelines on the quality that e-procurement systems must meet. STQC (MeitY's testing and certification body) was supposed to audit GeM against them. The CAG found this audit was not done for the e-bidding module [15].
  • Without that audit, no one could confirm that online bids could not be tampered with [15].

  • A low price was not guaranteed

  • The CAG found gaps in economy and price reasonableness (whether the government paid a fair price) and weak transparency controls [15].
  • The note says GeM improves transparency [3]. The CAG's findings show that depends on controls the auditor found weak.

  • Departments still go around GeM

  • A 2026 CAG audit in Haryana found ₹5.28 crore bought through a separate e-procurement portal instead of GeM, with no reason recorded [17].
  • Only four departments had registered their existing vendors on GeM. 453 vendors were left out, and annual procurement plans had not been put on GeM since 2021–22 [17].
  • Fee cuts for sellers mean little if buyers do not use the platform.

12. What Parliament's Committee Says Should Come Next

  • GeM should flag late payments automatically
  • The Standing Committee wants GeM linked to the Samadhaan/ODR system so that late payments are flagged without the MSE having to complain [16].
  • GeM already records every order, so it can see when payment is due and whether it has been made.

  • Penalties under the MSMED Act should be time-bound

  • The Committee asked for compulsory buyer compliance and time-bound resolution, backed by penalties under the MSMED Act, 2006 [16].

  • Link GeM with the MSME Sambandh portal and build one vendor list

  • The Committee called for time-bound integration of the MSME Sambandh portal (which tracks central buying from MSEs) with GeM, and a central national vendor directory [16].
  • That would let the government track each buyer's SC/ST and women sub-targets from live order data, not year-end returns.

  • MeitY and GeM should finish the security audit the CAG asked for

  • The STQC audit of e-bidding was found pending in 2020 [15]. A trusted, fraud-proof platform matters for the 'Trusted Seller' push [1].

13. Anchors for Answers

  • Data: About ₹8.1 lakh crore in delayed payments to MSMEs (Economic Survey 2025–26, as cited by Parliament's Standing Committee on Industry) [16]
  • Data: 2,56,892 Samadhaan applications worth about ₹55,244 crore; ODR settled only 17 cases in eight months [16]
  • Data: MSE share of central procurement at 43.58%, against a 25% floor; SC/ST-owned share about 1.3%, against a 4% sub-target [9][10]
  • Report/Committee: CAG Report No. 18 of 2020 on GeM: STQC audit of e-bidding not done, payment delays, weak price-reasonableness controls [15]
  • Report/Committee: Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Industry, 333rd Report (March 2026): CPSE-wise sub-targets, GeM-based flagging of late payments, Sambandh–GeM integration [16]
  • Report/Committee: CAG Haryana Report No. 3 of 2026: purchases routed away from GeM without recorded reasons [17]
  • Law/Case: MSMED Act, 2006: the statutory duty on buyers to pay MSEs on time, and the forum for late-payment disputes; Public Procurement Policy for MSEs Order, 2012 (amended 9 Nov 2018) [7]
  • Scheme: MSME Samadhaan and the ODR portal (complaints about late payment); MSME Sambandh (tracks procurement from MSEs); TReDS with CGTMSE guarantee (invoice financing) [12][16]

14. Mains Relevance

15. Related Topics to Study Next

  • Public Procurement Policy for MSEs Order, 2012: the legal basis for the 25%, 4% and 3% targets.
  • TReDS (RBI-regulated): how receivables discounting works and how the exchanges are licensed.
  • CGTMSE: the credit guarantee now being extended to TReDS invoices.
  • MSMED Act, 2006 and its delayed-payment provisions: the statutory remedy for late payments to MSEs.
  • Revised MSME classification (2020, revised in 2025): decides who counts as an MSE.
  • Udyam Registration and Udyam Assist: formalisation, which is a precondition for most benefits.
  • ONDC and the Digital Public Infrastructure stack: a parallel push for digital market access.
  • WTO Government Procurement Agreement: India is an observer, not a party, which affects trade-policy questions.

16. NCERT Concepts to Revise

  • Government e-Marketplace (Polity): GeM is the platform at the centre of the note; know its launch, purpose and ministry.
  • Micro, small and medium enterprises (Economy): The reforms target micro and small enterprises, including the 25% procurement mandate and delayed-payment problems.
  • Credit guarantee (Economy): CGTMSE guarantees for invoice discounting and collateral-free GeM SAHAY loans rest on this idea.
  • Collateral (Economy): GeM SAHAY lends against purchase orders without collateral, which removes a major barrier for small firms.
  • Comptroller and Auditor General (Polity): CAG audits found GeM's payment delays and its missing security audit of e-bidding.
  • Standing committee (Polity): The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Industry proposed fixes for late payments and for missed SC/ST sub-targets.

17. Common Errors / Trap Areas

  • Ministry: GeM falls under Commerce & Industry, not the Ministry of MSME. The procurement policy, however, is administered by the Ministry of MSME [4][6].
  • Baseline of the charge cut: The 2026 release says the rate went from 0.50% to 0.30% [1]. The Sept 2024 release says the ₹10 lakh–₹10 crore band went from 0.45% to 0.30% [2]. Know which baseline a question uses.
  • MSE vs MSME: The 25% mandate covers Micro and Small enterprises only. Medium enterprises are excluded [1][6].
  • GeM SAHAY vs TReDS: GeM SAHAY lends against a purchase order, before the goods are supplied. TReDS discounts trade receivables (invoices), after supply [1].
  • Sub-targets: The SC/ST sub-target is 4% and the women sub-target is 3%. They are often swapped [6].

Sources

  1. 1GeM Samvad 2026 – PIB (Ministry of Commerce & Industry), 28 Oct 2026pib.gov.in · tier 1
  2. 2GeM celebrates 100 days of governance; announces drastic reduction in its transaction chargespib.gov.in · tier 1
  3. 3Explainer: Government e-Marketplace (GeM)static.pib.gov.in · tier 1
  4. 4PIB Factsheet: Government E-Marketplace (GeM)pib.gov.in · tier 1
  5. 5GeM touches annual procurement of INR 1 lakh crore in FY 2021-22pib.gov.in · tier 1
  6. 6Procurement of goods from SCs/STs and women entrepreneurspib.gov.in · tier 1
  7. 7Year End Review 2021 – Ministry of MSMEpib.gov.in · tier 1
  8. 8Procurement of Goods and Services from MSMEs by PSEspib.gov.in · tier 1
  9. 9Year End Review 2025 – Ministry of MSMEpib.gov.in · tier 1
  10. 10Year End Review 2024 – Ministry of MSMEpib.gov.in · tier 1
  11. 11Budget 2026-27 Speechindiabudget.gov.in · tier 1
  12. 12Key Features of Budget 2026-27indiabudget.gov.in · tier 1
  13. 13Union Budget 2026-27: Building Champion MSMEs for a Global Indiapib.gov.in · tier 1
  14. 14PIB Summary of Union Budget 2026-27static.pib.gov.in · tier 1
  15. 15CAG Report No. 18 of 2020 (Union, Commercial) – Executive Summary: Audit of Government e-Marketplacecag.gov.in · tier 1
  16. 16Press Release on the 333rd Report of the Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Industrypib.gov.in · tier 1
  17. 17CAG Haryana Report No. 3 of 2026 – IS Auditcag.gov.in · tier 1

Mains Q&A on this note

NCERT concepts in this note

Also on 28 October

All 28 October articles →