Elections, reservations and ward-level participation
Urban Local Government: Municipalities and Cities · section 4 of 11
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this note
Detail
1. The legal base: Part IXA
- The Constitution (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992 added Part IXA ("The Municipalities") to the Constitution. Part IXA is the set of articles on local self-government in towns and cities [4].
- The rules on elections, reservation and ward committees all sit in Part IXA: Art. 243S (wards committees), Art. 243T (reservation of seats) and Art. 243ZA (elections to municipalities) [4].
2. Who conducts municipal elections — Art. 243ZA
- State Election Commission (SEC) means a constitutional body in each state that runs elections to local bodies. It is separate from the Election Commission of India, which runs Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha, assembly, President and Vice-President elections.
- Under Art. 243ZA, the same SEC that runs panchayat polls also conducts municipal elections. Its appointment and removal follow the panchayat article (see the panchayati-raj note).
- The Governor appoints the State Election Commissioner (NCERT Class 11 puts it simply as "the State government appoints").
- The SEC prepares the voter lists and conducts the polls. The state legislature can make laws on other election matters, such as how wards are drawn.
3. Elections must be on time — Kishansing Tomar (2006)
- Case: Kishansing Tomar v. Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad, (2006) 8 SCC 352, decided by a Constitution Bench (a bench of five or more judges that decides important questions on the Constitution) [7].
- What the Court held:
- The 74th Amendment gave a municipality a five-year term, and that term assumes elections are held regularly [7].
- Elections must be completed before the five-year term ends.
- Only extraordinary situations, such as natural calamities, can justify a delay. Government inaction or a pending delimitation is not enough.
-
If the state government does not cooperate, the SEC can go to the courts to get its orders carried out.
-
Why it matters: an unelected period means the city is run by an administrator (a government officer, not a person the people elected). That defeats the purpose of the 74th Amendment.
4. Delays still happen
| City / State | What happened | Gap |
|---|---|---|
| Chennai (Greater Chennai Corporation) | Council term ended in 2016. Fresh elections only in 2022. | About 6 years |
| Bengaluru (BBMP) | Council term ended in 2020. The city was restructured under the Greater Bengaluru set-up in 2025 while still without a council. | 5+ years |
| Maharashtra (incl. BMC, Mumbai) | Corporation polls held up for years by cases over ward boundaries and OBC quota. | Several years |
- Maharashtra case, step by step:
- The dispute was over whether the OBC reservation that the Banthia Commission (2022) recommended for local bodies was valid [6].
- 6 May 2025: the Supreme Court told the SEC to notify local body elections within four to ten weeks. OBC reservation was to follow the state law as it stood before the 2022 Banthia report [6].
-
16 September 2025: the Court found that the SEC had not acted in time. It ordered that elections to all local bodies (Zila Parishads, Panchayat Samitis and Municipalities) be completed by 31 January 2026 [6].
-
Lesson: the Constitution sets a clear rule, but states still delay polls by using litigation, redrawing wards and quota disputes.
5. Reservation of seats — Art. 243T
Reservation of seats in municipalities means that some seats are set apart so that only candidates from a certain group (SC, ST, women and, if the state chooses, OBC) can contest them.
| Clause | Group | Rule |
|---|---|---|
| 243T(1) | SC and ST | Seats reserved in proportion to their population in the municipal area [2] |
| 243T(2)–(3) | Women | At least one-third of directly elected seats, including one-third within SC/ST seats. Seats are rotated among wards [2] |
| 243T(4) | Chairpersons (mayor / municipal president) | Reserved for SC, ST and women "in such manner as the Legislature of a State may, by law, provide" [2]. Left to state law. |
| 243T(6) | Backward classes (OBC) | Optional. The state may provide it. |
- Key contrast (a common trap):
- Panchayats — Art. 243D(4): the Constitution itself mandates reservation of chairperson posts.
-
Municipalities — Art. 243T(4): the Constitution leaves it to state law.
-
Rotation means a reserved seat moves to a different ward at the next election. That way, no ward stays reserved forever.
- OBC quota and the triple test (K. Krishna Murthy v. Union of India, 2010). The triple test is a set of three conditions a state must meet before it gives OBC reservation in local bodies: 1. Set up a dedicated commission to study, with real data, how backward OBCs are in local-body politics. 2. Fix the share of OBC seats body by body, based on that study. 3. Keep total reservation (SC + ST + OBC) within 50%.
- If a state skips the test, courts can strike down the OBC quota. This is why Maharashtra's elections were stuck (see §4).
6. Women in urban local bodies
- Beyond one-third: many states have raised women's reservation to 50% by their own laws.
-
2023: 17 states and 1 UT had 50% for urban local bodies, against 21 states and 2 UTs for panchayats (NCERT Class 9).
-
Attempt to make 50% national: the Constitution (112th Amendment) Bill, 2009 proposed raising women's reservation in municipalities from one-third to one-half. This would cover ordinary seats, SC/ST seats and chairperson posts [5].
-
It was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 24 November 2009. It went to the Standing Committee on Urban Development, which reported on 25 June 2010. No further action followed, so the 50% rule is still a matter of state law [5].
-
Effect on the ground (NCERT Class 11, c. 2005):
- 30+ women mayors of city corporations.
- 500+ women heads of town municipalities.
- About 650 nagar panchayats headed by women.
- Women gained power and confidence. But some acted as proxies, meaning a male relative made the real decisions (often called "pati-pradhan" or "councillor-pati").
7. Bringing government closer — wards committees (Art. 243S)
- A ward is the smallest area of a city that elects one councillor.
- A wards committee is a body made up of one or more wards. Through it, people of the area deal with local issues.
- Art. 243S rules:
- Required in every municipality with a population of three lakh or more [3].
- The state legislature decides its make-up, its area and how its seats are filled [3].
- The ward councillor is a member. If the committee covers only one ward, the councillor chairs it.
-
States may set up other committees as well.
-
In practice (NCERT Class 6):
- Ward committees run health camps and campaigns against single-use plastic.
- They report water leaks, blocked drains and damaged roads to the corporation.
- How well they work differs from state to state.
8. Below the ward — area sabhas and participatory budgeting
- Area sabha: a meeting of all voters of one polling-booth area. It is the urban version of the gram sabha.
- Model Nagara Raj Bill (2008):
- Under JNNURM (Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission, launched 2005–06), a Community Participation Law was a mandatory reform. States had to pass it to receive central money.
- The model bill proposed area sabhas and area sabha representatives to link citizens with the ward committee [8].
- A May 2010 study for the urban development ministry looked at people's views on the ward committee system and the proposed area sabha system [8].
-
Adoption has been patchy. Many states passed the law on paper, but few area sabhas meet regularly.
-
Participatory budgeting: citizens suggest local works to be included in the city budget. Pune has done this since 2006.
9. Citizens' duties are part of participation
- Participation is more than voting (NCERT Class 6):
- Segregate waste at home (wet and dry).
- Report leaks and broken services quickly.
- Attend ward or area meetings and follow up on complaints.
Prelims Hooks
- Art. 243ZA → elections to municipalities are run by the State Election Commission, not the Election Commission of India.
- Art. 243S → wards committees are compulsory only where population is 3 lakh or more.
- Art. 243T(4) → reservation of chairperson posts in municipalities is left to state law. Under Art. 243D(4) the Constitution mandates it for panchayats. A classic trap.
- Art. 243T(6) → OBC reservation in municipalities is optional, not mandatory.
- Women's reservation: at least one-third of seats, including within SC/ST seats, rotated among wards. 50% exists only under state laws.
- Constitution (112th Amendment) Bill, 2009 → proposed 50% women's reservation in municipalities. It never passed.
- Kishansing Tomar (2006) → Constitution Bench: municipal elections must be held before the five-year term ends. Only natural calamity-type emergencies justify delay.
- K. Krishna Murthy (2010) → OBC quota in local bodies must pass the triple test: dedicated commission, body-wise data, 50% overall cap.
- Banthia Commission (2022) → Maharashtra's OBC local-body commission. In September 2025 the Supreme Court set a 31 January 2026 deadline for all Maharashtra local body polls.
- Area sabha = voters of one polling-booth area. Proposed in the Model Nagara Raj Bill (2008) under JNNURM.
Mains Points
- Delayed elections weaken the 74th Amendment. Chennai (2016–22), Bengaluru (from 2020) and Mumbai left cities to unelected administrators despite Kishansing Tomar.
-
Reforms: give SECs the same independence and powers as the ECI. Fix ward delimitation and reservation timelines before the term ends. Make the SEC's poll notification binding without state consent.
-
Reservation vs. timeliness. The triple test protects the 50% cap and fair OBC representation. But states that do not collect data in advance use the pending test as a reason to postpone polls.
-
Remedy: set up a permanent backward-class commission for local bodies, or hold polls under the existing law while the issue is decided (the Supreme Court's May 2025 approach).
-
Women's reservation: gains and limits. Many women mayors and chairpersons have gained real power and confidence. But proxy rule, rotation that cuts careers short after one term, and weak mayoral powers limit the effect.
-
Remedy: a national 50% rule (the lapsed 2009 Bill), longer rotation cycles, and training for women councillors.
-
Participation deficit below the ward. Ward committees exist only in large cities and differ by state. Area sabhas under the Community Participation Law remain mostly on paper.
- Remedy: statutory area sabhas with fixed meeting dates, ward-level budgets, and participatory budgeting on the Pune model. These would make urban democracy as close to the people as the gram sabha.
Sources
- 1Class 11, Ch 8 "Local Governments"; Class 6, Ch 12 "Grassroots Democracy – Part 3: Local Government in Urban Areas"; Class 9, Ch 6 "Democracy" (primary)
- 2Article 243T: Reservation of seatsconstitutionofindia.net · tier 3
- 3Article 243S: Constitution and composition of Wards Committees, etc.constitutionofindia.net · tier 3
- 4Part IXA: The Municipalitiesconstitutionofindia.net · tier 3
- 5The Constitution (112th Amendment) Bill, 2009 (Amendment of article 243T), PRS Bill Trackprsindia.org · tier 1
- 6Supreme Court of India, Order dated 16 September 2025 (Maharashtra local body elections, OBC reservation)api.sci.gov.in · tier 1
- 7Supreme Court of India, Judgment dated 2 July 2018 (citing Kishansing Tomar, (2006) 8 SCC 352)api.sci.gov.in · tier 1
- 8Enhancing public participation through effective functioning of Area Sabhas (TERI, May 2010), MoHUAmohua.gov.in · tier 1