Assess the impact of U.S. tariff policy volatility (2025-26) on India's export competitiveness and the global trading system governed by the WTO.
In this answer
U.S. trade policy swung sharply between April 2025, when near-universal "reciprocal" tariffs were imposed under emergency powers, and February 2026, when the U.S. Supreme Court struck them down in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, replacing them with a flat 10% tariff [1]. For India and for the WTO, the unpredictability has proved as damaging as the tariff levels themselves.
Adverse effects on India's export competitiveness
- Demand compression: the IMF projects India's growth moderating from 6.6% (2025) to 6.2% (2026) largely owing to higher U.S. tariffs, with shipments to the U.S. losing momentum [4].
- Labour-intensive sectors — textiles, gems and jewellery, marine products — face the sharpest margin squeeze, having little pricing power to absorb duties.
- Contract uncertainty: the replacement 10% duty rests on a time-limited statutory authority, deterring long-horizon buyer contracts and investment [1][3].
Cushioning factors
- The effective U.S. tariff rate fell from 14% to about 9.9% after the ruling, with pharmaceuticals and semiconductor-related goods exempted — protecting India's largest merchandise export line [3].
- Services and IT exports lie outside the tariff net; domestic GST reform partly offset the shock [4].
- The IMF finds deeper integration with alternative partners the least distortionary response — validating India's FTA push over retaliation [5].
Stress on the WTO order
- The WTO projected world merchandise trade volume falling 0.2% in 2025, with North American exports down 12.6% [2].
- Tariffs set unilaterally under emergency powers bypass MFN and bound-tariff commitments, in a system whose Appellate Body is already paralysed.
- The judgment restored tariff-setting to the legislature [1] — a domestic constitutional correction, not a multilateral one.
The episode confirms that rules, not rates, anchor trade confidence. India's durable response lies in export diversification, FTA deepening, PLI-backed value addition and coalition-building for WTO dispute-settlement reform — converting a volatile external environment into an opportunity for resilient, rules-based integration.
Sources
- 1Supreme Court Rules Against Tariffs Imposed Under IEEPA (CRS Legal Sidebar LSB11398, Congress.gov)Feb 2026 ruling, IEEPA held not to authorise tariffs, tariff power vests in Congress
- 2WTO, "Temporary tariff pause mitigates trade contraction, but strong downside risks persist" (16 April 2025)world merchandise trade volume −0.2% in 2025; North American exports −12.6%
- 3OECD Economic Outlook, Interim Report March 2026 — Recent Developmentseffective U.S. tariff rate down from 14% to ~9.9%; new 10% across-the-board tariff; pharma and semiconductor exemptions
- 4IMF, Regional Economic Outlook: Asia and Pacific, October 2025India's growth 6.6% (2025) moderating to 6.2% (2026) on higher tariffs; GST reform offset; Asian shipments to U.S. slowing
- 5IMF Working Paper WP/25/147, "Trade Partners' Responses to US Tariffs" (18 July 2025)retaliation and subsidies distortionary; deeper integration with other partners the welfare-superior response