·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEconomyIR

Assess the impact of U.S. tariff policy volatility (2025-26) on India's export competitiveness and the global trading system governed by the WTO.

In this answer
  1. Adverse effects on India's export competitiveness
  2. Cushioning factors
  3. Stress on the WTO order

U.S. trade policy swung sharply between April 2025, when near-universal "reciprocal" tariffs were imposed under emergency powers, and February 2026, when the U.S. Supreme Court struck them down in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, replacing them with a flat 10% tariff [1]. For India and for the WTO, the unpredictability has proved as damaging as the tariff levels themselves.

Adverse effects on India's export competitiveness

  • Demand compression: the IMF projects India's growth moderating from 6.6% (2025) to 6.2% (2026) largely owing to higher U.S. tariffs, with shipments to the U.S. losing momentum [4].
  • Labour-intensive sectors — textiles, gems and jewellery, marine products — face the sharpest margin squeeze, having little pricing power to absorb duties.
  • Contract uncertainty: the replacement 10% duty rests on a time-limited statutory authority, deterring long-horizon buyer contracts and investment [1][3].

Cushioning factors

  • The effective U.S. tariff rate fell from 14% to about 9.9% after the ruling, with pharmaceuticals and semiconductor-related goods exempted — protecting India's largest merchandise export line [3].
  • Services and IT exports lie outside the tariff net; domestic GST reform partly offset the shock [4].
  • The IMF finds deeper integration with alternative partners the least distortionary response — validating India's FTA push over retaliation [5].

Stress on the WTO order

  • The WTO projected world merchandise trade volume falling 0.2% in 2025, with North American exports down 12.6% [2].
  • Tariffs set unilaterally under emergency powers bypass MFN and bound-tariff commitments, in a system whose Appellate Body is already paralysed.
  • The judgment restored tariff-setting to the legislature [1] — a domestic constitutional correction, not a multilateral one.

The episode confirms that rules, not rates, anchor trade confidence. India's durable response lies in export diversification, FTA deepening, PLI-backed value addition and coalition-building for WTO dispute-settlement reform — converting a volatile external environment into an opportunity for resilient, rules-based integration.

Sources

  1. 1Supreme Court Rules Against Tariffs Imposed Under IEEPA (CRS Legal Sidebar LSB11398, Congress.gov)Feb 2026 ruling, IEEPA held not to authorise tariffs, tariff power vests in Congress
  2. 2WTO, "Temporary tariff pause mitigates trade contraction, but strong downside risks persist" (16 April 2025)world merchandise trade volume −0.2% in 2025; North American exports −12.6%
  3. 3OECD Economic Outlook, Interim Report March 2026 — Recent Developmentseffective U.S. tariff rate down from 14% to ~9.9%; new 10% across-the-board tariff; pharma and semiconductor exemptions
  4. 4IMF, Regional Economic Outlook: Asia and Pacific, October 2025India's growth 6.6% (2025) moderating to 6.2% (2026) on higher tariffs; GST reform offset; Asian shipments to U.S. slowing
  5. 5IMF Working Paper WP/25/147, "Trade Partners' Responses to US Tariffs" (18 July 2025)retaliation and subsidies distortionary; deeper integration with other partners the welfare-superior response
Practice
3 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity