Beyond income: the Kerala-Haryana-Bihar comparison and public facilities

Measuring Development: Income, HDI and Sustainability · section 4 of 10

In this note
  1. Detail
  2. Prelims Hooks
  3. Mains Points

Detail

1. The comparison table (Class 10, Tables 1.3–1.4)

State Per capita NSDP 2023-24, current prices (ES 2024-25) IMR per 1,000 live births (2020) Literacy rate % (2017-18) Net Attendance Ratio, secondary, ages 15–17 (2017-18)
Haryana ₹3,25,759 28 82 73
Kerala ₹2,81,001 6 94 94
Bihar ₹60,337 27 62 69
  • Per capita NSDP (Net State Domestic Product ÷ state population) is the average income of one person in a state. The figures are for 2023-24, at current prices, from the Economic Survey 2024-25.
  • Income ranking: Haryana > Kerala > Bihar.
  • Haryana ÷ Kerala = 3,25,759 ÷ 2,81,001 ≈ 1.16 times.
  • Haryana ÷ Bihar = 3,25,759 ÷ 60,337 ≈ 5.4 times.
  • Kerala ÷ Bihar ≈ 4.7 times.

  • Outcome ranking: Kerala is far ahead on health and education. Haryana is richer but falls behind on the indicators that matter most for a good life.

  • Lesson: a higher average income does not automatically mean better health or schooling.

2. Defining the indicators

Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)

  • IMR = (number of babies who die before their first birthday in a year ÷ live births in that year) × 1,000.
  • Worked example: a district has 50,000 live births in a year and 300 infant deaths. IMR = 300 ÷ 50,000 × 1,000 = 6, which is Kerala's level.
  • Kerala (2020): 6 of every 1,000 babies die before age one. Haryana (2020): 28.
  • NCERT arithmetic slip: NCERT says Haryana's IMR is "nearly three times" Kerala's. In fact 28 ÷ 6 ≈ 4.7 times, so the gap is bigger than the text says.
  • NCERT inconsistency: the text says the IMR data are "during 2018", but the table heading says 2020.
  • Latest national figure: India's IMR fell from 39 (2014) to 27 per 1,000 live births (2021), according to the Sample Registration System (SRS) Statistical Report 2021 [4].
  • Related measures:
  • Neonatal Mortality Rate (NMR) counts deaths in the first 28 days of life per 1,000 live births. Kerala's NMR is 4 (SRS 2021), already better than the SDG target of ≤12 by 2030 [4].
  • Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) counts mothers' deaths from pregnancy-related causes per 1 lakh live births. Kerala's MMR is 20 (SRS), already inside the SDG target of ≤70 [4].

Literacy rate

  • Literacy rate = the literate share of the population aged 7 years and above (the Census rule).
  • Kerala 94%, Haryana 82%, Bihar 62% (2017-18).

Net Attendance Ratio (NAR)

  • NAR = (children of the official age group who attend school at that level ÷ all children in that age group) × 100.
  • In this table, the level is secondary school and the age group is 15–17.
  • Over-age and under-age pupils are left out, so NAR can never go above 100.
  • Bihar's NAR is 69 (2017-18). So about one-third of its 15–17-year-olds are not in secondary school. In NCERT's words, "nearly one-third of your class friends would be missing."

Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER)

  • GER = (total enrolment at a level, of any age ÷ population of the official age group) × 100.
  • Over-age and under-age pupils are counted, so GER can be more than 100%.
  • Worked example: a village has 100 children aged 15–17. Of these, 70 attend secondary school. Another 40 older or younger pupils also attend secondary classes.
  • NAR = 70 ÷ 100 × 100 = 70%.
  • GER = (70 + 40) ÷ 100 × 100 = 110%.
  • The high GER hides the fact that 30 children of the right age are out of school.

3. Latest data that extend the NCERT picture

SDG India Index 2023-24 (NITI Aayog)

  • The SDG India Index is NITI Aayog's composite score (0–100) that ranks states on how far they have gone towards the 17 Sustainable Development Goals.
  • Kerala scores 79, joint top with Uttarakhand. Bihar scores 57, the lowest of all states (2023-24) [2][3].
  • The range of state scores rose from 42–69 (2018) to 57–79 (2023-24) [2].
  • India's overall score: 57 (2018) → 66 (2020-21) → 71 (2023-24) [2][3].
  • The ranking matches NCERT's story: Kerala is at the top, and Bihar remains at the bottom even while it improves.

NFHS-5 (National Family Health Survey, 2019-21)

  • NFHS is a large household survey of health, nutrition and family welfare, run by the Union Health Ministry.
  • Stunting means a child is too short for their age, a sign of long-term undernutrition. Among children under 5 across India, it fell only slightly, from 38% (NFHS-4, 2015-16) to 36% (NFHS-5) [6].
  • Bihar's Total Fertility Rate (TFR) is 2.98 (NFHS-5). TFR is the average number of children a woman has in her lifetime. Bihar is well above the replacement level of 2.1 [6].
  • In Bihar, the share of women who operate a bank account rose from 26% to 77% between NFHS-4 and NFHS-5 [7]. Access to services can improve even in a low-income state.
  • Kerala's new problem: 34–46% of Kerala's women are overweight or obese (NFHS-5). Kerala also has the highest share of men with high or very high blood sugar, at 27% [7]. Kerala has solved the old problems (infant deaths, illiteracy) and now faces lifestyle diseases.

India in the Human Development Report (HDR) 2025, UNDP

  • India's HDI value rose from 0.676 (2022) to 0.685 (2023). Its rank improved from 133 to 130 out of 193 countries [5].
  • India is in the "medium human development" group. It is close to the "high" threshold of HDI ≥ 0.700 [5].
  • The gains came mainly from mean years of schooling and per capita income [5].
  • Theme of HDR 2025: "A Matter of Choice: People and Possibilities in the Age of AI" [5].

4. Gender and schooling gaps: rural Uttar Pradesh (Table 1.5, Activity 2)

Category Male Female
Literacy rate, rural population 76% 54%
Literacy, rural children 10–14 90% 87%
Rural children 10–14 attending school 85% 82%
  • (a) Literacy is 76% for rural males and only 54% for rural females.
  • The problem is not just that many adults never went to school.
  • Many children are out of school today, so the gap will carry into the next generation.

  • (b) Out of school: 100 − 82 = 18% of girls and 100 − 85 = 15% of boys aged 10–14.

  • Illiterate in the same age group: 100 − 87 = 13% of girls and 100 − 90 = 10% of boys.

  • (c) It is disturbing that so many 10–14-year-olds are still illiterate more than 75 years after Independence.

  • Missed constitutional goal: a Directive Principle aimed at free and compulsory education for all children up to age 14 by 1960. The target was missed.
  • It later became a legal right under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009. Details are in human-capital.

5. Regional disparity

  • Regional disparity means that income, infrastructure and human development are uneven across states.
  • Broadly, the richer south and west are ahead of the central and eastern states (Bihar, UP, MP, Jharkhand, Odisha).
  • The SDG India Index (NITI Aayog) ranks states on a single composite score. The latest edition is 2023-24: Kerala 79, Bihar 57 [2]. (Scaffold note: check whether a newer edition has come out.)

6. Why income is not enough: public facilities

What money cannot buy

  • NCERT: "Money in your pocket cannot buy all the goods and services that you may need to live well."
  • Usually money cannot buy:
  • a pollution-free environment;
  • unadulterated medicines (medicines that are not fake or mixed with cheap stuff), unless you move to a community that already has them;
  • protection from infectious diseases, unless the whole community takes preventive steps. One family cannot stop malaria alone.

Public facilities

  • Public facilities are goods and services that are best and most cheaply provided collectively: security, schools, health care, a clean environment.
  • Why collective provision is cheaper:
  • One security arrangement for a whole locality costs less than a guard for every house.
  • You can study because other children also want to study, and because people believe the government should open schools.

  • When public facilities are missing: many girls still cannot reach high school because there is no school nearby, no safe transport or no toilets.

  • The theory of public goods is in market-structures-competition:
  • non-rival: one person's use does not reduce what is left for others;
  • non-excludable: you cannot stop people who do not pay from using it.

Kerala's secret

  • Kerala's low IMR comes from the "adequate provision of basic health and educational facilities" (NCERT).
  • The chain of cause and effect:
  • educated mothers → better care of babies, earlier visits to doctors, higher immunisation;
  • health centres close by → safe deliveries in institutions;
  • result → IMR of 6 (2020) and NMR of 4 (2021) [4].

Public Distribution System (PDS)

  • The PDS is the government network of ration shops (fair price shops) that sell food grains at subsidised prices. How it works is covered in agri-marketing-msp-pds.
  • Where the PDS works well, people's health and nutrition are likely to be better.
  • Tamil Nadu: 90% of rural people used a ration shop, against West Bengal: 35% (NCERT data).
  • Why rural Tamil Nadu is better off:
  • wide use of the PDS shows that the system actually delivers cheap food;
  • cheap, reliable food gives food security;
  • food security leads to better nutrition and lower illness.

Community participation

  • Community participation means citizens working together for shared goals, for example cleaning public places, planting trees or running a school committee.
  • It creates local public goods without any market exchange. Nobody buys or sells anything.

What makes facilities work (Ex. 3)

  • Good facilities depend on more than the money spent. They also need:
  • governance (honest, accountable administration);
  • staff presence, since teachers and doctors must actually turn up;
  • community demand, since people must ask for the services;
  • social norms, for example whether families are willing to send girls to school;
  • local participation.

Prelims Hooks

  • Per capita income order (2023-24): Haryana > Kerala > Bihar. IMR (2020) best: Kerala (6). Haryana (28) is richer but has a higher IMR than Bihar (27).
  • NCERT's "nearly three times" is wrong. Haryana's IMR is 28 ÷ 6 ≈ 4.7 times Kerala's.
  • NAR ≤ 100 always. GER can exceed 100, because it counts over-age and under-age pupils.
  • Literacy rate (Census) is measured for the population aged 7 years and above.
  • India's IMR is 27 per 1,000 live births (SRS 2021), down from 39 in 2014 [4]. Kerala's NMR is 4 and MMR is 20 (SRS) [4].
  • SDG India Index 2023-24 (NITI Aayog): Kerala 79 (joint top with Uttarakhand), Bihar 57 (lowest), India 71 [2][3].
  • HDR 2025 (UNDP): India ranks 130 of 193, with an HDI of 0.685 (2023), in the "medium" category. "High" starts at 0.700 [5].
  • NFHS-5 (2019-21): stunting among under-5 children fell from 38% to 36%. Bihar's TFR is 2.98, against a replacement level of 2.1 [6].
  • PDS use in rural areas (NCERT): Tamil Nadu 90% vs West Bengal 35%.
  • Free and compulsory education up to age 14 by 1960 was a Directive Principle. It became a legal right through the RTE Act, 2009.

Mains Points

  • Growth vs development (GS-III): Haryana earns about 1.16 times Kerala's per capita income but has about 4.7 times its infant mortality. Kerala has the top SDG score of 79 (2023-24) [2]. This shows that spending on health and education turns income into well-being. Use it to argue for public investment in human capital, and against judging progress by GDP alone.
  • Public goods and state capacity (GS-II/III): clean air, disease control and security are cheapest when provided collectively. The Tamil Nadu (90%) vs West Bengal (35%) PDS gap shows that governance and delivery matter as much as the money allocated. Link to reforms such as the NFSA, ONORC and DBT.
  • Kerala model and its limits: Kerala's early gains now face a second-generation burden. 34–46% of its women are overweight or obese, and 27% of its men have high blood sugar (NFHS-5) [7]. Development goals must move from survival to managing non-communicable diseases (NCDs).
  • Regional and gender disparity: Bihar's low NAR (69) and high TFR (2.98) [6], and rural UP's 22-point gender gap in literacy, justify targeted schemes and needs-based transfers from the Finance Commission. They also show why social norms and community demand must be built alongside infrastructure.

Sources

  1. 1Class 10, Ch 1 "Development"; Class 11, Ch 4 "Human Capital Formation in India"; Class 11, Ch 8 "Comparative Development Experiences of India and its Neighbours"; Class 12, Ch 2 "National Income Accounting" (primary)
  2. 2Release of SDG India Index 2023-24 (PIB)pib.gov.in · tier 1
  3. 3SDG India Index 2023-24 report (NITI Aayog)niti.gov.in · tier 1
  4. 4India witnesses a steady downward trend in maternal and child mortality towards achievement of SDG 2030 targets (PIB, SRS 2021)pib.gov.in · tier 1
  5. 5India's human development continues to make progress, ranks 130 out of 193 countries (UN in India, HDR 2025)india.un.org · tier 2
  6. 6Union Health Minister releases NFHS-5 report (PIB)pib.gov.in · tier 1
  7. 7National Family Health Survey-5, Phase I findings (PIB)pib.gov.in · tier 1