·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolity

The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, 2023 is a landmark legislation but its implementation is contingent on preconditions that render it distant from immediate operationalisation. Critically analyse.

In this answer
  1. Why it is a landmark
  2. Preconditions that defer operationalisation
  3. The political limits of fast-tracking

The Constitution (106th Amendment) Act, 2023 reserves one-third of seats in the Lok Sabha, State Assemblies and the Delhi Assembly for women [1]. Its symbolic and substantive value is undisputed; yet a self-imposed commencement condition keeps the guarantee on paper.

Why it is a landmark

  • Ends nearly three decades of deadlock since the first Bill of 1996, passing with near-unanimity in both Houses [5].
  • Corrects a structural deficit: women are only about 15% of Lok Sabha MPs and roughly 9% of MLAs, against over 45% in Sweden, Norway and South Africa [4].
  • Scales upward the tested 73rd/74th Amendment model of local-body reservation, with sub-reservation for SC/ST women within reserved seats [1].

Preconditions that defer operationalisation

  • The Act operates only after a delimitation based on the first Census after its commencement [1] — an executive-paced trigger inside a constitutional right.
  • With enumeration scheduled for 2027 and delimitation following, effective application slips past the 2029 general election.
  • The 15-year sunset thus begins from a date Parliament does not control, compressing the corrective window.
  • Rotation of reserved constituencies at each delimitation discourages sustained constituency-building by women legislators.

The political limits of fast-tracking

  • The Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026, introduced on 16 April 2026, sought to delete the Census precondition and let Parliament choose the Census for delimitation [2]; the companion Delimitation Bill, 2026 proposed using the 2011 Census and raising Lok Sabha strength to 850 [3].
  • It was negatived in the Lok Sabha on 17 April 2026 [2], the linked Bills falling with it — confirming that the special majority under Article 368 makes consensus, not intent, the binding constraint.
  • Bundling the quota with delimitation attracted federal resistance, as southern States face reduced seat shares [3]. Parties also remain free in ticket distribution.

The Adhiniyam is therefore landmark in principle but conditional in practice. Delinking commencement through cross-party consensus, adhering to the announced Census-delimitation calendar, and encouraging voluntary party quotas in the interim can convert entitlement into representation — realising Article 15(3)'s promise of substantive equality and SDG 5.5.

Sources

  1. 1Women's Reservation Bill, 2023 — PRS Legislative Research Bill Trackone-third reservation, SC/ST sub-reservation, census-and-delimitation commencement condition, 15-year duration, rotation of seats
  2. 2The Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026 — PRS Legislative Researchremoval of the Census precondition; introduced 16 April 2026 and negatived in Lok Sabha on 17 April 2026
  3. 3The Delimitation Bill, 2026 — PRS Legislative Researchuse of the latest published (2011) Census, Delimitation Commission, seat-share changes across States
  4. 4Women in Parliament and State Assemblies — PRS Vital Stats15% women in Lok Sabha, 9% in State Assemblies, international comparison
  5. 5PIB — Union Home Minister participates in the discussion on Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam in Lok Sabhapassage of the Adhiniyam in Parliament in September 2023
Practice
5 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity