·PIB·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEconomy

Production Linked Incentive schemes in pharmaceuticals and medical devices have reduced import dependence but raise questions of fiscal cost and sustainability. Discuss.

In this answer
  1. Gains in reducing import dependence
  2. Questions of fiscal cost
  3. Questions of sustainability

The Department of Pharmaceuticals runs three PLI schemes — Bulk Drugs (₹6,940 cr), Pharmaceuticals (₹15,000 cr) and Medical Devices (₹3,420 cr) — to secure critical APIs and high-end devices under Atmanirbhar Bharat [1]. Physical capacity has genuinely returned, but its fiscal efficiency and post-incentive durability remain untested.

Gains in reducing import dependence

  • Bulk drugs: 39 projects covering 28 APIs/KSMs commissioned; fermentation-based Penicillin-G, Clavulanic Acid and Rifampicin are made domestically again — capacity no private firm would have restarted unaided [1].
  • Pharmaceuticals: ₹46,744 cr invested against a ₹17,275 cr target, with 1,21,294 jobs and about 64% of sales exported, i.e. sold at world prices [1].
  • Medical devices: production of 57 unique devices has begun — MRI, CT, cath labs, linear accelerators — with global firms localising operations [1].
  • Capacity now exists for 28 of 41 identified critical products [3].

Questions of fiscal cost

  • Against ₹25,360 cr committed, the releases report investment, sales and jobs but not incentive actually disbursed — so cost per job or per rupee of output cannot be computed [1].
  • Investment 2.7 times the target invites the reading that part of it was inframarginal, i.e. coming anyway.
  • The device incentive of 5% on incremental sales can reward ordinary sectoral growth [1].

Questions of sustainability

  • Roughly two-thirds of bulk drug and intermediate imports still come from China, "mainly due to economic considerations" [2] — Indian plants must beat that price once the five-year support ends [1].
  • Bulk drug exports are only ~15% of its sales, showing limited global cost-competitiveness [1].
  • 13 critical products remain uncovered [3], and devices — where 86% of requirement is imported [3] — got the smallest outlay [1]; assembly of imported high-value parts merely shifts dependence down the chain.

PLI has rebuilt manufacturing at the finished-product end faster than at the raw-material end. Completing the Bulk Drug Parks (₹3,000 cr; Himachal Pradesh, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh) to permanently lower running costs [4], publishing disbursement data for CAG and parliamentary scrutiny, and linking device incentives to India-made components would convert a time-bound subsidy into lasting self-reliance in healthcare.

Sources

  1. 1Press Release on PLI Schemes for Bulk Drugs, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices, PIB Delhi (25 Sep 2026)scheme outlays, 39 projects/28 APIs commissioned, fermentation products, ₹46,744 cr investment, export and employment figures, 57 devices, 5% incremental-sales incentive, five-year period
  2. 2APIs Imports from China, PIB (Rajya Sabha reply)two-thirds of bulk drug/intermediate imports from China, mainly on economic considerations
  3. 3Impact of Bulk Drug Parks and Medical Device Parks, PIBcapacity for 28 of 41 critical products; 86% import dependence in medical devices
  4. 4Centre Grants 'in-Principle' Approval of three Bulk Drug Parks to Himachal Pradesh, Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh, PIB₹3,000 cr Bulk Drug Parks scheme and the three States
Practice
11 questions on this item
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity