Q1. With reference to Public Interest Litigation (PIL) jurisprudence in India, consider the following statements: 1. PIL jurisdiction emerged in the late 1970s through a judicial relaxation of the rule of locus standi, permitting any public-spirited citizen to invoke Article 32 on behalf of disadvantaged groups. 2. In State of Uttaranchal v. Balwant Singh Chaufal (2010), the Supreme Court empowered courts to impose exemplary costs on PILs filed for oblique or extraneous motives. 3. PIL is expressly defined and regulated by a specific Article inserted into Part III of the Constitution by amendment. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- PIL jurisdiction emerged in the late 1970s through a judicial relaxation of the rule of locus standi, permitting any public-spirited citizen to invoke Article 32 on behalf of disadvantaged groups.
- In State of Uttaranchal v. Balwant Singh Chaufal (2010), the Supreme Court empowered courts to impose exemplary costs on PILs filed for oblique or extraneous motives.
- PIL is expressly defined and regulated by a specific Article inserted into Part III of the Constitution by amendment.
- A. 1 and 2 only
- B. 2 and 3 only
- C. 1 only
- D. 1, 2 and 3