Directive Principles and Fundamental Duties

1. Directive Principles: origin, nature and purpose

Read the detailed note →

• Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) are the guidelines in Part IV (Arts. 36-51). They tell the State how to build a just welfare society. Courts cannot enforce them, but they are basic to how the country is governed.
• Origin: India took the idea from the Irish Constitution of 1937 (Art. 45, "Directive Principles of Social Policy"). Class 7 says DPSP was "inspired by the Irish Constitution". The Sapru Committee (1945) and B.N. Rau had both suggested splitting rights into two kinds: those courts can enforce and those they cannot.
• Instrument of Instructions: under the Government of India Act 1935, the British gave written instructions to the Governor-General and Governors. Ambedkar said the directives were the same kind of instructions, but given to the legislature and executive of free India.
• Purpose: economic democracy (Ambedkar's idea that the vote is not enough and people also need a fair economic deal) and a welfare state (a State that actively works for people's well-being).
• Non-justiciability of Directive Principles: Art. 36 gives "State" the same meaning as Art. 12. Art. 37 says no court can enforce the directives, but they are "fundamental in the governance of the country" and the State has a duty to apply them when it makes laws.
• Class 11's reasons: the framers wanted to give policy direction without tying the hands of future governments. They trusted the moral force of the directives and expected voters to hold governments to account.

• Class 7 puts it simply: Fundamental Rights (FRs) are promises you can take to a judge. Directives are goals that take time to reach.

• Classification of Directive Principles: there are two ways to group them.

NCERT grouping (Class 11)	Conventional grouping
Goals: welfare; social, economic and political justice; better living standards; fair sharing of resources; international peace	Socialistic: Arts. 38, 39, 39A, 41, 42, 43 (living wage), 43A
Non-justiciable rights: adequate livelihood, equal pay, protection from economic exploitation, right to work, care and education for children below six	Gandhian: Arts. 40, 43 (cottage industries), 43B, 46, 47 (prohibition), 48 (cattle)
Policies: UCC, prohibition, cottage industries, cattle slaughter, village panchayats	Liberal-intellectual: Arts. 44, 45, 48 (modern farming), 48A, 49, 50, 51

• Assessment:
• Critics: K.T. Shah called the directives "a cheque on a bank payable at the convenience of the bank". Naziruddin Ahmad called them "New Year's resolutions" and T.T. Krishnamachari "a veritable dustbin of sentiments". K. Santhanam warned they could cause friction between the Centre and states, and between the President and the PM.
• Defenders: Granville Austin called Parts III and IV together the "conscience of the Constitution".
• Class 11 asks (exercise 6) whether the poor need binding directives more than FRs. South Africa offers a contrast: its constitution lets courts enforce socio-economic rights.

2. Socialistic directives: justice, livelihood and labour

Read the detailed note →

• Socialistic principles aim at economic justice and a welfare state. They cover Arts. 38, 39, 39A, 41, 42, 43, 43A.
• Social order based on justice (Art. 38): Clause (1) asks for a social order in which social, economic and political justice runs through every institution. Clause (2), added by the 44th Amendment, 1978, asks the State to reduce inequalities of income, status, facilities and opportunities. Class 7 labels Art. 38 "Social, Political, and Economic Justice".
• Art. 39 has six clauses:
• Adequate means of livelihood (39(a)): enough means of living for men and women equally.
• Equitable distribution of material resources (39(b)-(c)): the community's resources should be shared for the common good, and wealth should not pile up in a few hands to the common harm. In 2024 the Supreme Court held that not all private property counts as a "material resource of the community" (Section 7).
• Equal pay for equal work (39(d)): for men and women. It was given effect by the Equal Remuneration Act 1976, now part of the Code on Wages 2019. Courts enforce it through Art. 14 (Randhir Singh, 1982; Jagjit Singh, 2016, for temporary workers).

• Protection against economic exploitation (39(e)-(f)): workers' health and children's young age must not be abused because of poverty. Children should grow up in freedom and dignity (39(f), substituted by the 42nd Amendment, 1976).

• Art. 39A (42nd Amendment, 1976): equal justice and free legal aid, given effect by the Legal Services Authorities Act 1987.

• Right to work, education and public assistance (Art. 41): help in unemployment, old age, sickness and disability, "within the limits of its economic capacity". Class 7 labels Art. 41 "Welfare Government".
• Arts. 42-43:
• Art. 42: just and humane working conditions and maternity relief.

• Art. 43, living wage: a wage that allows a decent life with leisure and social and cultural chances. It ranks above a fair wage, which ranks above a minimum wage (Fair Wages Committee, 1948).

• Workers' participation in management (Art. 43A, 42nd Amendment, 1976): workers should share in running industries. The government ran voluntary schemes in 1975 and 1983.

• Labour codes: the Code on Wages 2019 and the Code on Social Security 2020 came into force on 21 November 2025. They absorbed the Minimum Wages Act 1948, the Equal Remuneration Act 1976 and the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 (26 weeks' leave since 2017), and set a national floor wage.

3. Gandhian directives: village, cottage, weaker sections, prohibition and cattle

Read the detailed note →

• Gandhian principles reflect Gandhi's programme of village self-rule (gram swaraj), simple living and social reform.
• Organisation of village panchayats (Art. 40): the State should set up village panchayats as units of self-government. The 73rd Amendment, 1992, gave them constitutional status (details in panchayati-raj).
• Promotion of cottage industries (Art. 43): the State should promote cottage industries in rural areas, run by individuals or cooperatives, for example through the Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC, 1957).
• Art. 43B (97th Amendment, 2011) promotes cooperatives that are formed freely, run themselves and are controlled democratically.

• In Union of India v. Rajendra N. Shah (2021), the Court struck down Part IXB as it applied to state cooperatives, because half the states had not ratified it.

• Promotion of interests of weaker sections (Art. 46): the State should take special care of the education and economic interests of the weak, especially SCs and STs, and protect them from injustice and exploitation. Class 11 cites reservations as one way this is done.

• Nutrition and public health directive (Art. 47): the State should raise nutrition and living standards and improve public health (Class 7: "Nutrition, standard of living, and public health").

• PM POSHAN is the school mid-day meal scheme, renamed in 2021. It gives hot cooked meals in government and aided schools and is backed by the NFSA 2013.

• Prohibition of intoxicating drinks (Art. 47): the State should try to ban alcohol and harmful drugs, except for medical use.

• Gujarat, Bihar (2016), Mizoram, Nagaland and Lakshadweep enforce prohibition (verify current).
• F.N. Balsara (1951) upheld prohibition by referring to Art. 47.

• The debate: poisonous illicit liquor ("hooch") deaths and lost tax revenue.

• Prevention of cattle slaughter (Art. 48): the State should ban the slaughter of cows, calves and other milch and draught cattle.

• Mohd Hanif Qureshi (1958) upheld a ban on cow slaughter but not on slaughtering bulls that were no longer useful.
• Mirzapur Moti Kureshi (2005, seven judges) upheld Gujarat's total ban, reading Arts. 48 and 51A(g) together.
• The ban pulls against Art. 19(1)(g) (freedom of trade), food choice and the cost of stray cattle to farmers.

4. Liberal-intellectual directives, amendments and directives outside Part IV

Read the detailed note →

• Liberal-intellectual principles reflect liberal and modern ideas. They cover Arts. 44, 45, 48 (modern farming), 48A, 49, 50 and 51. Art. 44 (UCC) is covered in Section 8.
• Early childhood care and education (Art. 45): originally Art. 45 asked for free schooling for all children up to 14 within ten years. Once elementary education became a fundamental right under Art. 21A, the 86th Amendment, 2002, changed Art. 45 to care and education for all children until they turn six (anganwadis under ICDS since 1975).
• Art. 48 also asks for farming and animal husbandry on modern scientific lines.
• Protection of environment and wildlife (Art. 48A, 42nd Amendment, 1976): the State should protect and improve the environment and safeguard forests and wildlife. It matches the citizen's duty in Art. 51A(g). It was given effect by the Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972, the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980 and the Environment (Protection) Act 1986.
• Protection of monuments (Art. 49): the State should protect monuments, places and objects that Parliament declares to be of national importance. This is done through the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act 1958.
• Separation of judiciary from executive (Art. 50): judges, not government officers, should try cases. This was done largely by the CrPC 1973, which gave trials to judicial magistrates, and was carried into the BNSS 2023.
• Promotion of international peace and security (Art. 51): fair and honourable relations between nations, respect for international law and treaties, and settling disputes by arbitration. Examples: Panchsheel, non-alignment, UN peacekeeping.

Amendment	Change to Part IV
42nd, 1976	Substituted 39(f); added 39A, 43A, 48A
44th, 1978	Added 38(2)
86th, 2002	Substituted Art. 45
97th, 2011	Added 43B

• Directives outside Part IV: these are also not enforceable by courts, but courts read them alongside FRs.
• Art. 335: claims of SCs and STs to government jobs, consistent with efficiency. The 82nd Amendment, 2000, allowed relaxed standards for them.
• Art. 350A: teaching in the mother tongue at primary level (7th Amendment, 1956).
• Art. 351: development of Hindi.

5. Giving effect to the directives: laws, schemes and rights

Read the detailed note →

• What Class 11 lists as implemented: zamindari abolition bills, bank nationalisation, factory laws, minimum wages, support for cottage and small industries, and reservations for SCs and STs. Later came the right to education, panchayati raj, a "partial right to work" under employment guarantee, and the mid-day meal.
• Zamindari abolition: after 1950, states passed laws removing landlords who stood between the tiller and the State (UP and Bihar Acts, 1950). Tenancy reform and ceilings on landholding followed.
• These laws were challenged under the right to property.
• The 1st Amendment, 1951, and the Ninth Schedule protected them.

• How far land reform succeeded varied a lot from state to state.

• Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005 (MGNREGA): gave 100 days of unskilled paid work a year to every rural household that asked for it.

• Features: an unemployment allowance if work was not given, work within 5 km, at least one-third women workers, social audit by the gram sabha, and a 60:40 split between wages and materials.
• It put Art. 41's partial right to work into practice.
• The VB–G RAM G Act 2025 replaced it from 1 July 2026 with a 125-day guarantee (verify rollout details and funding pattern).

• Problems: limited budgets, late wages, and a debate over whether funds should follow demand or a fixed allocation.

• Directives turned into rights: courts have read many directives into Art. 21 (right to life) or Art. 14 (equality), so the line between "enforceable" and "not enforceable" has blurred.

Directive	Became
Art. 45 (education)	Art. 21A (Unni Krishnan, 1993; 86th Amendment, 2002)
Art. 47 (nutrition)	Right to food (PUCL, 2001 onwards; NFSA 2013)
Art. 39A (legal aid)	Free legal aid under Art. 21 (M.H. Hoskot, 1978; Hussainara Khatoon, 1979)
Art. 48A (environment)	Right to a clean environment (Subhash Kumar, 1991)
Arts. 39(a), 41 (livelihood, work)	Right to livelihood (Olga Tellis, 1985)

• Class 11's exercise 8 (grain rotting in FCI godowns while people go hungry) is the classroom version of the right to food.

6. Rights versus directives: the conflict, 1951-1976

Read the detailed note →

• Class 11's frame: FRs and directives can work together. FRs stop the State from doing certain things, while directives push it to act. FRs protect the individual; directives serve society as a whole.
• Conflict between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles: the two clashed when land reform laws, made to carry out directives, were challenged under the right to property.
• The government amended the Constitution, arguing that rights could be cut down to carry out directives.

• The Court held that FRs were too important to be limited, even for that purpose.

• Champakam Dorairajan case (1951):

• The Court struck down Madras's caste-based quotas for college admission under Art. 29(2). It said directives cannot override FRs.

• The result was the 1st Amendment, 1951. It added Art. 15(4), Arts. 31A and 31B with the Ninth Schedule, and new grounds for restricting speech in Art. 19(2).

• The land and property cases that followed:

• Shankari Prasad (1951) upheld the 1st Amendment.
• Bela Banerjee (1954) led to the 4th Amendment, 1955.
• Sajjan Singh (1965) again upheld Parliament's power to amend FRs.
• Golaknath (1967, eleven judges, 6:5) held that Parliament cannot cut down FRs, even to carry out directives.

• R.C. Cooper (1970) struck down bank nationalisation, and Madhav Rao Scindia (1970) struck down the de-recognition of former princes.

• Parliament's reply: the 24th Amendment, 1971, restored Parliament's power to amend FRs. The 25th Amendment, 1971, replaced "compensation" with "amount" and added Art. 31C. The 26th Amendment ended privy purses.

• Article 31C: laws carrying out Art. 39(b)-(c) could not be challenged under Arts. 14, 19 and 31. A further clause stopped courts from even asking whether a law really served that purpose.
• Kesavananda Bharati (1973, thirteen judges): upheld the first part of Art. 31C, struck down the clause that blocked court review, and laid down the basic structure doctrine (core features of the Constitution that no amendment can destroy). Details are in amendment-basic-structure.
• 42nd Amendment, 1976: extended Art. 31C's shield to laws carrying out any directive. This was the high point of directives ranking above rights.

7. From primacy to harmony: Minerva Mills to Property Owners Association

Read the detailed note →

• Minerva Mills (1980):
• Struck down the 42nd Amendment's extension of Art. 31C, along with Art. 368(4)-(5).

• Held that harmony and balance between FRs and directives is itself part of the basic structure. Neither part can be placed wholly below the other.

• Waman Rao (1981): upheld Arts. 31A and 31B (for Ninth Schedule laws passed before 24 April 1973) and the original Art. 31C.

• Doctrine of harmonious construction: when two provisions seem to clash, courts read them together so that both can work. Courts use it to fit FRs and directives together.
• How courts use directives today:
• To judge whether a limit on an FR is reasonable (Balsara, 1951; Kureshi, 2005).
• To decide what counts as a "public purpose".

• To widen the meaning of FRs (Section 5).

• The Art. 39(b) debate: in Ranganatha Reddy (1977), Krishna Iyer J, in a minority view, said private property is also a "material resource of the community". Sanjeev Coke (1983) relied on this view.

• Property Owners Association case (5 November 2024, nine judges): it arose from Maharashtra's law on old cessed buildings. CJI D.Y. Chandrachud wrote for the majority, B.V. Nagarathna J partly agreed, and Sudhanshu Dhulia J dissented.
• Not every privately owned resource is a material resource of the community. The test looks at the resource's nature, how scarce it is, its effect on the community and the harm if it stays in private hands.
• It rejected the Krishna Iyer view as tied to one economic ideology.

• It held that the original Art. 31C, as upheld in Kesavananda, still survives.

• Current links: reading directives in the light of the market economy after 1991, the "welfare vs freebies" debate, and climate protection (Art. 48A read with Art. 21 in M.K. Ranjitsinh, 2024).

8. The uniform civil code

Read the detailed note →

• Uniform civil code (Art. 44): "The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India." It means one common law on marriage, divorce, inheritance and adoption for everyone. Class 11 lists it as a policy, and Class 7's infographic includes it.
• Constituent Assembly:
• Minoo Masani, Hansa Mehta and Rajkumari Amrit Kaur wanted the UCC to be enforceable by courts.
• On 23 November 1948, Mohammad Ismail, Naziruddin Ahmad and B. Pocker Sahib opposed it as a threat to personal law. K.M. Munshi, Alladi Krishnaswami Ayyar and Ambedkar defended it. Ambedkar suggested it could at first apply only to those who chose it.

• Narasu Appa Mali (Bombay HC, 1952) held that personal laws are not "law in force" under Art. 13, which kept them outside FR review.

• Hindu Code Bill: reform of Hindu personal law. Ambedkar resigned in 1951 after it stalled. It was later passed in parts: the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 and the Hindu Succession, Minority and Guardianship, and Adoptions and Maintenance Acts of 1956. In 2005 an amendment to the Succession Act made daughters coparceners (equal joint heirs to family property), confirmed in Vineeta Sharma (2020).

• Special Marriage Act 1954: allows a civil marriage between any two people, whatever their religion, without either converting. Its 30-day public notice is criticised on privacy grounds. It was central to the same-sex marriage case (Supriyo, 2023).
• Goa Civil Code: a Portuguese code of 1867, kept after Goa's liberation in 1961. It gives largely common rules on marriage, property and succession to all communities, with some exceptions. The Supreme Court called it a "shining example" (Jose Paulo Coutinho, 2019).
• Shah Bano case (1985): a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under s.125 CrPC (now s.144 BNSS). The Court called Art. 44 a "dead letter".
• Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986: limited the ex-husband's duty to pay maintenance to the iddat period (about three months after divorce).

• Danial Latifi (2001) read the Act to require a fair provision for the woman's whole life. Mohd Abdul Samad (July 2024) held that s.125 CrPC is still available to her.

• Sarla Mudgal case (1995): a Hindu husband cannot convert to Islam to marry again without ending his first marriage. The Court urged a UCC. Lily Thomas (2000) clarified that the Court cannot order Parliament to make one.

• Shayara Bano case (22 August 2017, 3:2): struck down instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat).

• Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act 2019: makes it void and a cognisable offence (police can arrest without a warrant), punishable with up to three years in jail. The wife gets a subsistence allowance and custody of minor children.

• Law Commission: the 21st Law Commission (31 August 2018) found a UCC "neither necessary nor desirable at this stage" and preferred reforming each personal law. The 22nd Law Commission asked for public views in June 2023 (outcome — verify current).

• Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code Act 2024: the first state UCC after independence, drafted by the Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai committee and in force since 27 January 2025.
• It covers marriage, divorce and succession, and makes registration of live-in relationships compulsory.
• It bans polygamy and halala. Scheduled Tribes are exempt.

• High Court challenges are pending (verify current).

• The debate:

• For: gender justice, equality and national unity.
• Against: religious freedom (Arts. 25-26), minority identity, and tribal customary law (Arts. 371A, 371G, Sixth Schedule).
• Open questions: a "uniform" code or a "common" or optional one; how far states can act on a Concurrent List subject (entry 5).

9. Fundamental Duties: origin and content

Read the detailed note →

• Fundamental duties: the original Constitution had no list of duties. They are now in Part IVA (Art. 51A).
• Swaran Singh Committee: set up by the Congress party in 1976, during the Emergency. It recommended eight duties.
• The 42nd Amendment, 1976, added ten duties.
• It dropped the committee's ideas of letting Parliament punish people who ignore duties, and of a duty to pay taxes.

• The 86th Amendment, 2002, added an eleventh duty.

• Sources:

• The model was the Soviet (USSR) constitution. UDHR Art. 29(1) also says "everyone has duties to the community".

• Class 7 instead roots duties in India's own tradition, which stressed the duties of rulers and people (rajadharma, Kautilya's saptanga). It notes that Part IVA was "added in 1976".

• The eleven duties, grouped:

• Nation: (a) duty to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem. (b) Cherish the ideals of the freedom struggle. (c) Uphold sovereignty, unity and integrity. (d) Duty to defend the country and do national service when called upon.
• Society: (e) duty to promote harmony and brotherhood across religion, language, region and section, and give up practices that insult women's dignity. (f) Value and preserve our composite culture. (i) Safeguard public property and give up violence.
• Nature and reason: (g) duty to protect the environment, including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife, and to have compassion for living creatures. (h) Scientific temper: develop a scientific outlook, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform, a phrase made popular by Nehru.

• Excellence and education: (j) strive for excellence in every field. (k) Parents or guardians must give children aged 6-14 the chance to be educated (86th Amendment, 2002).

• Features:

• Duties apply to citizens only.
• Courts cannot directly enforce them.
• Rights do not depend on doing duties.

• They mirror directives: 51A(g) matches 48A, and 51A(k) matches Arts. 21A and 45.

• NCERT gaps: Class 11 says ten duties (now eleven since 2002). Class 7 letters its six duties a-f, but they are really clauses (a), (d), (f), (g), (j) and (k).

10. Making duties work: laws, courts and the enforceability debate

Read the detailed note →

• Verma Committee on Fundamental Duties (1999): led by Justice J.S. Verma, it found that many duties are already backed by laws. It also urged teaching duties in schools and running public awareness campaigns. The laws it listed:
• Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act 1971: punishes insults to the National Flag, the Constitution and the National Anthem.
• The Protection of Civil Rights Act 1955.
• IPC ss.153A-153B on promoting enmity between groups (now BNS ss.196-197).
• UAPA 1967 and the Representation of the People Act 1951.

• The Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972 and the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980.

• Flag rules: the Flag Code of India 2002 was amended in 2022 to allow the flag to fly day and night and to allow machine-made polyester flags. Class 7 recounts the 2004 Supreme Court case that let citizens fly the flag as part of free expression.

• Courts use duties to interpret the law, not as stand-alone commands:
• AIIMS Students' Union (2001) said duties are as important as rights.
• Ranganath Mishra (2003) directed steps to spread awareness of duties along Verma lines.
• M.C. Mehta (1991) ordered environmental education.

• Kureshi (2005) used 51A(g) to judge whether a restriction was reasonable.

• National anthem in cinemas: Shyam Narayan Chouksey made it compulsory by an interim order in November 2016 and optional in January 2018. Compare Bijoe Emmanuel (1986), which protected students who stood respectfully but did not sing.

• For enforcement: it would balance a "rights culture" with civic responsibility. The Swaran Singh committee's penalty idea and PILs asking for laws on duties (notice issued in 2022 — verify current) point this way.
• Against enforcement:
• Terms like "composite culture" and "scientific temper" are vague.
• Existing penal laws already cover much of the ground.
• Enforced duties could be used to pressure people who dissent.
• Class 11 notes that rights do not depend on duties.

• Some duties are missing, such as voting and paying taxes.

• Official framing: Constitution Day (26 November, since 2015), Rajpath renamed Kartavya Path (2022), and Amrit Kaal described as "Kartavya Kaal". For GS-IV, link duties to civic virtue and constitutional morality.

---

Exam angles

Prelims — high-yield facts and traps

• Articles: 38(2) inequalities (44th, 1978); 39(b)-(c) resources and wealth; 39(d) equal pay; 39A legal aid (42nd); 40 panchayats; 41 right to work; 42 maternity relief; 43 living wage and cottage industries; 43A workers' participation (42nd); 43B cooperatives (97th, 2011); 44 UCC; 45 care and education under six (86th, 2002); 46 weaker sections; 47 nutrition and prohibition; 48 agriculture and cattle; 48A environment (42nd); 49 monuments; 50 separation of judiciary; 51 international peace.
• Directives outside Part IV: 335 (SC/ST jobs), 350A (mother tongue), 351 (Hindi).
• Split articles (traps): Art. 43 (living wage is socialistic; cottage industries are Gandhian), Art. 47 (nutrition is socialistic; prohibition is Gandhian) and Art. 48 (modern farming is liberal; cattle slaughter is Gandhian).
• Sources: directives come from Ireland and duties from the USSR. "Directives come from the USSR" is FALSE.
• Committees: Sapru (1945); Swaran Singh (1976) recommended eight duties and ten were adopted; Verma (1999).
• Number of duties: the 42nd Amendment gave ten and the 86th added 51A(k) (ages 6-14). "There are ten duties today" is FALSE.
• Duty wordings often tested: composite culture (f), public property and non-violence (i), dignity of women (e), scientific temper and humanism (h), compassion for living creatures (g). "Duties apply to all persons" is FALSE; they apply to citizens only.
• Case chain: Champakam 1951 (directives below FRs) → Golaknath 1967 → Kesavananda 1973 (first part of 31C valid, court-review bar struck down) → Minerva Mills 1980 (harmony is basic structure) → Waman Rao 1981 → Sanjeev Coke 1983 → Property Owners Association 2024 (not all private resources are community resources).
• UCC: Goa's code (1867, kept after 1961); Uttarakhand Act 2024 (in force 27 January 2025, STs exempt, live-in registration); Shah Bano → 1986 Act → Danial Latifi 2001 → Mohd Abdul Samad 2024; Shayara Bano (3:2, 2017) → 2019 Act.
• Schemes and laws: MGNREGA (100 days) was replaced by the VB–G RAM G Act (125 days) from 1 July 2026. The labour codes, in force from 21 November 2025, absorbed the Minimum Wages and Equal Remuneration Acts.

Mains — GS-II themes

1. Directives are not enforceable yet "fundamental in governance". How far have they shaped policy? Weigh welfare promises against fiscal capacity, and compare South Africa's enforceable socio-economic rights with India's route of reading them into Art. 21.
2. From conflict to harmony: the property cases, Art. 31C, and whether Property Owners Association (2024) re-reads Art. 39(b) for a market economy.
3. Uniform civil code: gender justice and equality versus pluralism and minority and tribal autonomy. Consider state codes and federalism, and the Law Commission's preference for reforming each personal law.
4. Gandhian directives today: the costs and benefits of prohibition, cattle laws and farmers' livelihoods, and cooperatives and panchayats as self-government.
5. Should fundamental duties be enforceable? Discuss the balance of rights and duties, the risk of coercion and the "Kartavya" discourse (GS-IV: civic virtue).
6. Environment as directive, duty and right (Arts. 48A, 51A(g), 21): climate cases and what the State owes its people.

Current-affairs hooks

• UCC news: Uttarakhand's rules and High Court challenges, other states' committees and bills (Gujarat, Assam — verify current), Law Commission reports.
• Rollout of the VB–G RAM G Act and the debate over how employment guarantees should be designed and how the Centre and states share the cost.
• Labour codes in action (floor wage, social security for gig workers) as Arts. 39, 42 and 43 at work.
• Constitution Day, the official stress on duties, PILs on enforcing duties, and flag and anthem rules.
• Changes in prohibition policy and hooch deaths, amendments to cattle-slaughter laws, and maintenance and triple-talaq cases.